Skip to content

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml vs L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml and L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g.

Last verified: 07 Apr 2026 · Based on 24 reviews

84.0
Quick Answer

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml scores 84.0/100 vs L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g at 80.0/100. The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml wins on ingredient quality, value for money. L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g is stronger on skin compatibility and texture experience.

Which is better: The Ordinary Natural Moistu... or L'Oreal Deutschland Roche P...?

The Ordinary wins on value: it scores 93/100 for value versus La Roche-Posay's 63/100, and costs £6.19 less for more than double the product. Its richer NMF complex also edges ahead on ingredient quality (88 vs 83). Choose the La Roche-Posay if you specifically want niacinamide's pore-minimising and post-blemish benefits in a dedicated fluid format.

— AIScored Editorial Team

How Do the Scores Compare?

The Ordinary Natural Moistu...
L'Oreal Deutschland Roche P...
The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml
The Ordinary Natural Moistu...
The Ordinary
L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g
L'Oreal Deutschland Roche P...
L'Oreal
Overall Score 84.0 80.0
Effectiveness 78.0/100
Best
78.0/100
Best
Ingredient Quality 88.0/100
Best
83.0/100
Skin Compatibility 87.0/100 90.0/100
Best
Texture & UX 85.0/100 86.0/100
Best
Value for Money 93.0/100
Best
63.0/100
Best Price £11.40 Amazon UK →
Cheapest
£17.59 Amazon UK →
Form N/A N/A
Dose N/A N/A
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 12 12

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizin...

Pros

  • Rich NMF complex (amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, polyglutamic acid) closely mirrors skin's own hydration factors
  • Fragrance-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free — excellent tolerability across skin types
  • Lightweight, fast-absorbing texture praised across reviews; works as makeup base
  • Outstanding value for money — clinically-inspired formulation at drugstore price

Cons

  • Primarily humectant-driven — lacks significant occlusive or emollient content for very dry or compromised skin barriers
  • Urea, while beneficial, can occasionally cause mild tingling on sensitised or freshly-exfoliated skin
  • One reviewer reported persistent dry patches despite consistent use — may need layering with a richer balm for dry skin types
  • Sodium hyaluronate sits lower in the INCI than ideal for HA-seekers; it supplements rather than leads the formula

Best For

normal to combination skin oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration sensitive skin (fragrance-free, minimal irritants) layering under heavier creams or facial oils for dry skin morning routine base under SPF or makeup
View full review →

L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay ...

Pros

  • Extremely low irritation profile: fragrance-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, non-comedogenic
  • Niacinamide (~5%) supports skin barrier, reduces redness, minimises pores, and aids post-blemish recovery
  • Feather-light, fast-absorbing texture — ideal for oily/combination and acne-prone skin
  • Excellent makeup base — no pilling or interference with layers

Cons

  • Insufficient standalone hydration for dry or very dehydrated skin — requires a hydrating serum underneath
  • High price-per-ml for a relatively simple formulation (40ml tube)
  • Dimethicone, while non-comedogenic, may not suit users who prefer silicone-free products
  • Minimal occlusive action — does not lock in moisture effectively in harsh/cold climates

Best For

oily and combination skin acne-prone and blemish-prone skin sensitive and reactive skin redness and rosacea-prone skin post-procedure or compromised barrier skin minimal-ingredient routines
View full review →

What does the data say about The Ordinary Natural M... vs L'Oreal Deutschland Ro...?

Both moisturisers target oily and combination skin, but their formulation logic differs meaningfully. The Ordinary's NMF + HA (£11.40, scored 84/100) is built around a dense humectant complex — amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, and polyglutamic acid — that closely replicates the skin's own natural moisturising factors. La Roche-Posay's Toleriane Sensitive Fluid (£17.59, scored 80/100) takes a simpler approach, leading with niacinamide at roughly 5% to target barrier support, redness reduction, and pore appearance, with hydration playing more of a supporting role.

If your main goal is hydration and value, The Ordinary is the clearer pick — its value score of 93/100 reflects how much you're getting for £11.40. It layers well under makeup and suits anyone from oily to sensitive skin types, though it won't cut it as a standalone for very dry skin. The La Roche-Posay suits people managing active blemishes or post-breakout redness, where niacinamide's skin-evening properties justify the £17.59 price — but at 40ml, the price-per-ml is notably steep for what is a fairly minimal formula.

Both are fragrance-free and non-comedogenic, so irritation risk is low across the board. Neither carries third-party certification. The practical difference comes down to purpose: pick The Ordinary for hydration-first, budget-conscious skincare, and the La Roche-Posay when you need active blemish management alongside a calming base.

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml Winner 84.0/100

The Ordinary NMF + HA is a minimalist, fragrance-free lightweight moisturiser built around a comprehensive Natural Moisturizing Factor complex — amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, and sodium hyaluronate — all skin-identical humectants that closely mimic the skin's own moisture-retention system.

Effectiveness
The Ordinary Nat..
78.0/100
L'Oreal Deutschl..
78.0/100
Ingredient Quality
The Ordinary Nat..
88.0/100
L'Oreal Deutschl..
83.0/100
Skin Compatibility
The Ordinary Nat..
87.0/100
L'Oreal Deutschl..
90.0/100
Texture & UX
The Ordinary Nat..
85.0/100
L'Oreal Deutschl..
86.0/100
Value for Money
The Ordinary Nat..
93.0/100
L'Oreal Deutschl..
63.0/100

What are the key differences?

The Ordinary Natural Mo.. is best for: normal to combination skin, oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration
L'Oreal Deutschland Roc.. is best for: oily and combination skin, acne-prone and blemish-prone skin

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml or L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g?
The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml scores 84.0/100 overall while L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g scores 80.0/100. The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (78.0 vs 78.0). The Ordinary Natural Moisturiz is best suited for normal to combination skin and oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration. L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posa is better for oily and combination skin and acne-prone and blemish-prone skin.
Is The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml worth the price compared to L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g?
The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml costs £11.40 while L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g is £17.59. For value, The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml scores 93.0/100 vs L'Oreal Deutschland Roche Posay 15293769 Tol Sens Fluid, 40 g's 63.0/100. The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml delivers better value relative to its quality.

Related Product Comparisons

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream, Face & Body, With 3 essential ceramides & hyaluronic acid, For dry to very dry skin, 454 g/16 oz

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs Cetaphil Moisturising Lotion, 236ml, Face & Body Moisturiser, For Normal To Dry Sensitive Skin, With Niacinamide, Packaging May Vary

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs AESTURA ATOBARRIER365 CREAM with Ceramide, Korean Moisturiser, Korean Skincare, 120-Hour Hydrating Visible Capsule Moisturizer, Facial Cream for Dry & Sensitive Skin, Dermatologist Tested, 80mL

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs Cetaphil Daily Hydrating Face Moisturiser, 88ml, For Sensitive Skin, With Hyaluronic Acid, Packaging May Vary

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs La Roche-Posay Effaclar Duo+M Anti-Breakout Corrective Gel Moisturiser For Oily, Blemish-Prone Skin 40ml

VS

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml

vs PURITO Oat In Calming Gel Cream, Oat Seed Water, Lightweight Non-Sticky Moisturizer, Non-Comedogenic, Fragrance-Free, Korean Skincare, 100ml 3.38 fl.oz

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.