Skip to content

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml vs La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml and La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml.

Last verified: 07 Apr 2026 · Based on 24 reviews

84.0
Quick Answer

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml scores 84.0/100 vs La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml at 80.0/100. The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml wins on ingredient quality, skin compatibility, value for money. La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml is stronger on effectiveness and texture experience.

Which is better: The Ordinary Glucoside Foam... or La Roche-Posay Effaclar Pur...?

The Ordinary wins on value and ingredient quality (90 and 86 vs 79 and 71), costing £2.24 less for a gentler, fragrance-free formula. Choose La Roche-Posay Effaclar if you have oily or acne-prone skin — its zinc pidolate actively targets sebum and breakouts in a way The Ordinary cannot.

— AIScored Editorial Team

How Do the Scores Compare?

The Ordinary Glucoside Foam...
La Roche-Posay Effaclar Pur...
The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml
The Ordinary Glucoside Foam...
La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml
La Roche-Posay Effaclar Pur...
Overall Score 84.0 80.0
Effectiveness 82.0/100 83.0/100
Best
Ingredient Quality 86.0/100
Best
71.0/100
Skin Compatibility 84.0/100
Best
78.0/100
Texture & UX 78.0/100 86.0/100
Best
Value for Money 90.0/100
Best
79.0/100
Best Price £10.95 Amazon UK →
Cheapest
£13.19 Amazon UK →
Form N/A N/A
Dose N/A N/A
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 11 13

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming C...

Pros

  • Glucoside and betaine surfactant base — among the gentlest cleansing agents available, non-stripping
  • Completely fragrance-free and free of common sensitisers — genuine fit for reactive and sensitive skin
  • Effective daily cleansing including light makeup removal without compromising skin barrier
  • Excellent value for money — The Ordinary's pricing undercuts competitors with comparable formulations

Cons

  • May cause mild tightness or dryness for very dry or dehydrated skin types — follow with moisturiser
  • Foam format delivers less emollient feel than cream or oil cleansers; less suitable as a standalone for dry skin in winter
  • No additional actives (no niacinamide, AHAs, etc.) — purely a cleanser with no treatment benefit
  • 150ml size is modest for twice-daily use; heavier users may find it runs out faster than expected

Best For

sensitive and reactive skin prone to redness oily and combination skin as a morning or evening cleanse fragrance-sensitive skin budget-conscious skincare routines perimenopausal skin needing a non-hormonal-disrupting cleanser
View full review →

La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifyin...

Pros

  • Clinically relevant zinc pidolate active targets excess sebum and has mild antimicrobial action against acne-causing bacteria
  • Non-stripping: multiple reviewers with sensitive and combination skin report no tightness or dryness post-cleanse
  • Rich, satisfying foam from minimal product — bottle routinely lasts 4–6 months, improving cost-per-use
  • Noticeably reduces whiteheads and spots within weeks according to multiple independent reviewers

Cons

  • Contains parfum (fragrance) — a potential sensitiser and irritant for reactive or rosacea-prone skin
  • Primary surfactant is SLES (sodium laureth sulfate), which is effective but less gentle than next-generation surfactants such as sodium cocoyl glutamate; unsuitable for dry or compromised-barrier skin
  • Not a makeup remover — an Arabic reviewer specifically notes heavy makeup requires a dedicated first cleanse
  • Slightly elevated price point versus drugstore equivalents, though partially offset by longevity

Best For

oily and acne-prone skin combination skin with breakout concerns blackhead and whitehead reduction sensitive oily skin tolerating mild surfactants daily AM/PM cleanser in an anti-acne routine
View full review →

What does the data say about The Ordinary Glucoside... vs La Roche-Posay Effacla...?

Both of these are foaming cleansers, but they're built around quite different formulations. The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser (£10.95, 84/100) uses glucoside and betaine-based surfactants — a newer generation of cleansing agents that are significantly gentler on the skin barrier than older sulphate-based alternatives. It's completely fragrance-free, making it one of the more genuinely hypoallergenic options on the market. La Roche-Posay Effaclar (£13.19, 80/100) takes a different approach, using SLES (sodium laureth sulfate) as its primary surfactant — effective and well-tolerated by most people, but harsher than the glucoside alternatives — combined with zinc pidolate, an ingredient with evidence behind it for controlling sebum and mild antimicrobial activity against acne-causing bacteria.

If your main concern is sensitivity, redness, or you simply want a no-fuss daily cleanse that won't interfere with your skin barrier, The Ordinary is the clearer pick. It scores higher overall at 84 versus 80, costs less, and earns a value score of 90/100 — it genuinely is cheaper and better suited to what most people actually need from a cleanser. If you have persistently oily, breakout-prone skin and want an active ingredient working against excess sebum, the Effaclar earns its 83/100 effectiveness score and the zinc pidolate is a legitimate reason to choose it.

The practical difference comes down to skin type and fragrance sensitivity. The Ordinary's fragrance-free formula is the safer bet for rosacea-prone or reactive skin; the Effaclar contains parfum, which some people will react to. The Effaclar's 200ml bottle does tend to last well, but at £13.19 versus £10.95 for 150ml, The Ordinary still offers better value per wash for anyone who doesn't specifically need the acne-targeting ingredient.

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml Winner 84.0/100

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser is built around alkyl glucoside surfactants (Decyl Glucoside, Coco-Glucoside) paired with Cocamidopropyl Betaine — a trio of mild, sugar-derived and amphoteric cleansers that produce a light foam without the harshness of sulphates (SLS/SLES).

Effectiveness
The Ordinary Glu..
82.0/100
La Roche-Posay E..
83.0/100
Ingredient Quality
The Ordinary Glu..
86.0/100
La Roche-Posay E..
71.0/100
Skin Compatibility
The Ordinary Glu..
84.0/100
La Roche-Posay E..
78.0/100
Texture & UX
The Ordinary Glu..
78.0/100
La Roche-Posay E..
86.0/100
Value for Money
The Ordinary Glu..
90.0/100
La Roche-Posay E..
79.0/100

What are the key differences?

The Ordinary Glucoside .. is best for: sensitive and reactive skin prone to redness, oily and combination skin as a morning or evening cleanse
La Roche-Posay Effaclar.. is best for: oily and acne-prone skin, combination skin with breakout concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml or La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml?
The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml scores 84.0/100 overall while La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml scores 80.0/100. The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (82.0 vs 83.0). The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming is best suited for sensitive and reactive skin prone to redness and oily and combination skin as a morning or evening cleanse. La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purify is better for oily and acne-prone skin and combination skin with breakout concerns.
Is The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml worth the price compared to La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml?
The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml costs £10.95 while La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml is £13.19. For value, The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml scores 90.0/100 vs La Roche-Posay Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser For Oily, Breakout-Prone Skin 200ml's 79.0/100. The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml delivers better value relative to its quality.

Related Product Comparisons

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs Q+A Niacinamide Gentle Exfoliating Face Cleanser (125ml), Face Scrub, Exfoliating Face Wash with Jojoba Esters and Prebiotics, Cleanses While Calming Sensitivity and Blemish-Prone Skin, Fragrance Free

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs e.l.f. SKIN Holy Hydration! Clean Freak Daily Cleanser, Gentle Hydrating Gel Face Cleanser, Made With Hyaluronic Acid, Vegan & Cruelty-Free, 163ml

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs NEOSTRATA RESTORE PHA Hydrating Gel Facial Cleanser; Sensitive Skin Exfoliating Blackhead Remover; Pore Minimizer; Acne Face Wash Makeup Remover with Glycine for Collagen & Polyhydroxy Acid, 6.8 oz

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs Dermatica Anti-Breakout Balancing Glycerin Gel Cleanser

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs Eucerin Dermopure Clinical Purifying Cleanser 200ml, Facial Cleanser with Salicylic Acid & AHA/PHA, Cleanser for Sensitive, Oily Skin, Non-Comedogenic Face Wash

VS

The Ordinary Glucoside Foaming Cleanser, Gentle Foaming Face Wash for All Skin Types Including Sensitive Skin, 150ml

vs Simple Smooth+ Gel Facial Cleanser AHA + hyaluronic acid gently exfoliates and helps promote cell turnover for smoother, radiant skin 240 ml

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.