Skip to content

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets vs Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets and Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets.

Last verified: 07 Apr 2026 · Based on 119 reviews

77.0
Quick Answer

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets scores 77.0/100 vs Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets at 74.0/100. Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets wins on effectiveness, ingredient quality, side effects. Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets is stronger on value for money.

Which is better: Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets or Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc...?

Solgar Magnesium Citrate wins with a higher score (77 vs 74) and superior ingredient quality (86 vs 66), thanks to its more bioavailable citrate form. The Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc is worth considering for those who need bone support alongside magnesium, or are watching spending — it costs £2.78 less and offers 250 tablets.

— AIScored Editorial Team

How Do the Scores Compare?

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets
Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc...
Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets
Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets
Solgar
Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets
Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc...
Solgar
Overall Score 77.0 74.0
Effectiveness 82.0/100
Best
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality 86.0/100
Best
66.0/100
Value for Money 64.0/100 73.0/100
Best
Side Effects 91.0/100
Best
87.0/100
Certifications 58.0/100
Best
55.0/100
Best Price £12.00 Amazon UK → £9.22 Amazon UK →
Cheapest
Price per Serving £0.40 30 servings N/A
Form Tablet tablet
Dose 400mg (2 tablets) None
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 65 54

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets

Pros

  • Magnesium citrate form offers superior bioavailability versus cheaper oxide or carbonate alternatives
  • Strong user-reported improvements in sleep quality and depth
  • Effective for muscle cramps, restless legs, and leg spasms
  • Clean formulation — free from gluten, wheat, dairy, soy; vegan and Kosher certified

Cons

  • Only 30 servings per bottle (60 tablets at 2/day) — relatively short supply for the price
  • No third-party testing (NSF, Informed Sport, USP) to verify label accuracy
  • Some iHerb reviews appear cross-contaminated from Solgar's Calcium+Magnesium product, reducing review signal clarity
  • Large tablet size flagged by a minority of users as difficult to swallow

Best For

People with sleep difficulties or poor sleep quality Those experiencing leg cramps or restless leg syndrome Women in perimenopause or menopause Individuals on medications that deplete magnesium Vegans and those with multiple food allergies Buyers who prioritise brand trust and ingredient form over lowest price
View full review →

Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets

Pros

  • Consistently reported reduction in muscle cramps and nighttime leg spasms
  • Multiple reviewers note improved sleep depth and relaxation
  • Premium glass jar packaging widely praised as eco-friendly and quality-signalling
  • Clean label — no artificial additives, non-GMO, vegan, soy and wheat free

Cons

  • Tablets are notably large; frequently mentioned as a usability downside
  • Magnesium oxide included in the blend is the least bioavailable magnesium form
  • Calcium partially as carbonate — less well absorbed than citrate, especially without food
  • No independent third-party testing (e.g. NSF, Informed Sport)

Best For

Women over 40 seeking bone and dental support Adults experiencing muscle cramps or nighttime leg spasms Those wanting sleep and nervous system support from magnesium Vegans and vegetarians needing a mineral complex Older adults (65+) with elevated calcium and magnesium needs
View full review →

What does the data say about Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets vs Calcium Magnesium plus...?

The clearest difference between these two products is the form of magnesium used. Solgar's Magnesium Citrate uses magnesium citrate exclusively, which scores 86/100 for ingredient quality — well above the Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc's 66/100, largely because the latter blends in magnesium oxide, the least bioavailable form available. You're paying for a more absorbable mineral in the citrate-only product, and the scores reflect that gap clearly.

Who should buy which comes down to what you actually need. If your main concern is sleep quality, leg cramps, or restless legs, the Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets at £12.00 is the more targeted option — it scores 82/100 for effectiveness and 77/100 overall. If you want calcium and zinc alongside your magnesium, particularly for bone and dental support, the Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets at £9.22 makes sense. It scores lower overall at 74/100, but it does win on value at 73/100 versus 64/100, and 250 tablets is a much longer supply for the price.

Practically, the Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc tablets are frequently flagged by users as notably large, which puts some people off. The Magnesium Citrate bottle only contains 30 servings — two tablets per day burns through it quickly at that price. Neither product discloses a dose per serving for the combination formula, which makes direct milligram comparison difficult.

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets Winner 77.0/100

Solgar Magnesium Citrate delivers 400mg elemental magnesium per two-tablet serving in the bioavailable citrate form, backed by Solgar's 75-year reputation as a premium supplement brand.

Effectiveness
Magnesium Citrat..
82.0/100
Calcium Magnesiu..
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality
Magnesium Citrat..
86.0/100
Calcium Magnesiu..
66.0/100
Value for Money
Magnesium Citrat..
64.0/100
Calcium Magnesiu..
73.0/100
Side Effects
Magnesium Citrat..
91.0/100
Calcium Magnesiu..
87.0/100
Certifications
Magnesium Citrat..
58.0/100
Calcium Magnesiu..
55.0/100

What are the key differences?

Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets is best for: People with sleep difficulties or poor sleep quality, Those experiencing leg cramps or restless leg syndrome
Calcium Magnesium plus .. is best for: Women over 40 seeking bone and dental support, Adults experiencing muscle cramps or nighttime leg spasms

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets or Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets?
Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets scores 77.0/100 overall while Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets scores 74.0/100. Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (82.0 vs 80.0). Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets is best suited for People with sleep difficulties or poor sleep quality and Those experiencing leg cramps or restless leg syndrome. Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 25 is better for Women over 40 seeking bone and dental support and Adults experiencing muscle cramps or nighttime leg spasms.
Is Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets worth the price compared to Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets?
Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets costs £12.00 while Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets is £9.22. For value, Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets scores 64.0/100 vs Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets's 73.0/100. Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets delivers better value relative to its quality. Note that Magnesium Citrate 60 comes as tablet while Calcium Magnesium pl is tablet, which may affect your preference.
Which has fewer side effects?
Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets scores 91.0/100 for side effects (higher means fewer reported issues) while Calcium Magnesium plus Zinc 250 Tablets scores 87.0/100. Reviewers report fewer side effects with Magnesium Citrate 60 Tablets. For certification and testing, Magnesium Citrate 60 scores 58.0/100 vs Calcium Magnesium pl's 55.0/100. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.

Related Product Comparisons

What the Data Says

Why is magnesium oxide less effective than glycinate?

Oxide scores 21 points lower than glycinate in our testing — and it's not close on ingredient quality either. Across 17 magnesium products in our database, glycinate averages 74.3/100 overall. Oxide sits at 53/100. That's a gap you can feel.

The ingredient quality difference is even starker: 83.3 for glycinate vs 37.0 for oxide. A 46.3-point gap. The best glycinate in our database, Solgar Magnesium Glycinate 400mg, scores 80/100 overall with 88/100 on ingredient quality. The oxide product (Nature Made) manages just 52 on effectiveness and 37 on ingredient quality.

The reason is bioavailability. Magnesium oxide has roughly 4% absorption — most of it passes straight through your gut unused. Glycinate is chelated (bound to the amino acid glycine), which your intestines absorb much more efficiently. You also get fewer digestive side effects, since unabsorbed magnesium in the gut is what causes the laxative effect oxide is known for.

Oxide is cheap, which is why it's still everywhere. But cheap per pill means nothing if your body can't use it. Glycinate or citrate (avg 74.5/100) are both better choices.

Which form of magnesium is best for sleep, anxiety, or muscle cramps?

Glycinate for sleep and anxiety. Citrate for cramps. L-threonate for brain function. Each form has a different strength, and our scores back this up.

Sleep and anxiety → Glycinate. Averaging 74.3/100 across our database, with the best (Solgar Glycinate 400mg) hitting 80/100. Glycine, the amino acid it's bound to, acts as an inhibitory neurotransmitter — it calms your nervous system on its own. That's a two-for-one benefit you don't get from other forms. Thorne Bisglycinate (74/100) is another solid option at a lower dose.

Muscle cramps → Citrate. Averaging 74.5/100 overall with 85.0 on ingredient quality. Citrate absorbs well and is gentler on your wallet than glycinate. Solgar Citrate leads the pack at 77/100. If cramps are your main issue, this is the practical choice.

Brain function → L-Threonate. Life Extension Neuro-Mag scores 73/100. This is the only form shown to meaningfully raise magnesium levels in the brain by crossing the blood-brain barrier. It's pricier, but nothing else does what it does.

All-round absorption → Doctor's Best High Absorption tops our entire magnesium database at 82/100 overall (83 effectiveness, 88 ingredient quality) using chelated magnesium.

The one form to skip? Oxide at 53/100. Its 4% absorption rate makes it a poor choice no matter what you're taking it for.

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.