Skip to content

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder vs Thorne Creatine 405g

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder and Thorne Creatine 405g.

Last verified: 07 Apr 2026 · Based on 90 reviews

79.0
Quick Answer

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder scores 79.0/100 vs Thorne Creatine 405g at 74.0/100. Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder wins on value for money, side effects. Thorne Creatine 405g is stronger on effectiveness and ingredient quality.

Which is better: Transparent Labs Creatine H... or Thorne Creatine 405g?

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB edges ahead with a higher overall score (79 vs 74), though its HMB addition remains scientifically contested. Thorne is the better pick for competitive athletes needing NSF Certified for Sport credentials, despite its steep £42.99 price tag.

— AIScored Editorial Team

How Do the Scores Compare?

Transparent Labs Creatine H...
Thorne Creatine 405g
Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder
Transparent Labs Creatine H...
Transparent Labs
Thorne Creatine 405g
Thorne Creatine 405g
Thorne
Overall Score 79.0 74.0
Effectiveness 78.0/100 80.0/100
Best
Ingredient Quality 91.0/100 92.0/100
Best
Value for Money 62.0/100
Best
44.0/100
Side Effects 88.0/100
Best
87.0/100
Certifications 87.0/100 97.0/100
Best
Best Price View → £42.99 Amazon UK →
Cheapest
Price per Serving N/A £0.53 81 servings
Form N/A Powder
Dose N/A 5g per serving
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✓ Yes
Reviews Analysed 14 76

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder

Pros

  • Clinically dosed creatine monohydrate (5g) — the most research-backed supplement for strength and muscle
  • Transparent ingredient labeling with no proprietary blends — full disclosure of all doses
  • Third-party tested for purity and label accuracy
  • Positive user reports of strength gains and good mixability

Cons

  • Premium price point — significantly more expensive than plain creatine monohydrate
  • HMB evidence is mixed: some studies show benefits, others show minimal effect vs. creatine alone
  • Serving scoop reported as small and awkward to use
  • Limited flavour options compared to mainstream creatine products

Best For

Natural bodybuilders and strength athletes Intermediate to advanced gym-goers seeking recovery support Users who prioritise clean, verified ingredient labels Those in a resistance training program seeking concurrent strength and lean mass gains
View full review →

Thorne Creatine 405g

Pros

  • NSF Certified for Sport — the most credible certification for competitive and professional athletes
  • Pure micronized creatine monohydrate with zero fillers, binders, or additives
  • Neutral taste and good solubility — mixes cleanly into water, juice, or coffee
  • Well-established brand with a clinical-grade reputation used by professional sports teams

Cons

  • Significantly overpriced relative to equally pure creatine from budget or mid-tier brands — Reddit consensus is consistent on this
  • No Creapure (German) origin specified; sourcing transparency is limited for a premium-positioned product
  • Some Reddit users report recent concerns about quality consistency following Thorne's acquisition
  • The certification premium is meaningful only for drug-tested athletes — general fitness users are unlikely to need NSF-level assurance

Best For

Competitive and professional athletes subject to anti-doping testing Consumers who prioritise third-party purity verification above cost Women seeking creatine for strength, energy, and cognitive support Over-40s using creatine for muscle maintenance and brain health Those already buying other Thorne products and consolidating their supplement stack
View full review →

What does the data say about Transparent Labs Creat... vs Thorne Creatine 405g?

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder mixes 5g of creatine monohydrate with HMB while Thorne Creatine 405g sticks to pure micronized creatine monohydrate at the same 5g dose per serving. Both come as powder yet the first one adds HMB which some studies back for recovery and others find adds little beyond creatine alone. Thorne Creatine 405g scores higher on effectiveness at 80/100 compared with 78/100 for Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder. Ingredient quality sits close too with Thorne Creatine 405g at 92/100 and Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder at 91/100.

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder wins overall with 79/100 against 74/100 for Thorne Creatine 405g and it offers better value at 62/100 versus 44/100. Natural bodybuilders and intermediate to advanced gym goers who want recovery support should pick Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder especially if they like full ingredient disclosure without proprietary blends. Competitive athletes who need NSF Certified for Sport and women after strength and energy gains will prefer Thorne Creatine 405g despite its £42.99 price. Budget matters here since Thorne Creatine 405g costs more than many equally pure options.

Both products mix cleanly with neutral taste. Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder works for those who prioritise verified labels while Thorne Creatine 405g suits users who accept the higher cost for its certification.

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder Winner 79.0/100

Transparent Labs Creatine HMB combines 5g of creatine monohydrate with 1.5g of HMB (β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate) per serving, targeting muscle growth, strength, and recovery.

Effectiveness
Transparent Labs..
78.0/100
Thorne Creatine 405g
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality
Transparent Labs..
91.0/100
Thorne Creatine 405g
92.0/100
Value for Money
Transparent Labs..
62.0/100
Thorne Creatine 405g
44.0/100
Side Effects
Transparent Labs..
88.0/100
Thorne Creatine 405g
87.0/100
Certifications
Transparent Labs..
87.0/100
Thorne Creatine 405g
97.0/100

What are the key differences?

Transparent Labs Creati.. is best for: Natural bodybuilders and strength athletes, Intermediate to advanced gym-goers seeking recovery support
Thorne Creatine 405g is best for: Competitive and professional athletes subject to anti-doping testing, Consumers who prioritise third-party purity verification above cost

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder or Thorne Creatine 405g?
Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder scores 79.0/100 overall while Thorne Creatine 405g scores 74.0/100. Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (78.0 vs 80.0). Transparent Labs Creatine HMB is best suited for Natural bodybuilders and strength athletes and Intermediate to advanced gym-goers seeking recovery support. Thorne Creatine 405g is better for Competitive and professional athletes subject to anti-doping testing and Consumers who prioritise third-party purity verification above cost.
Is Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder worth the price compared to Thorne Creatine 405g?
For value, Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder scores 62.0/100 vs Thorne Creatine 405g's 44.0/100. Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder delivers better value relative to its quality.
Which has fewer side effects?
Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder scores 88.0/100 for side effects (higher means fewer reported issues) while Thorne Creatine 405g scores 87.0/100. Reviewers report fewer side effects with Transparent Labs Creatine HMB Powder. For certification and testing, Transparent Labs Cre scores 87.0/100 vs Thorne Creatine 405g's 97.0/100. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.

Related Product Comparisons

What the Data Says

Why do 87% of UK creatine products lack third-party certification?

87% of UK creatine products have zero independent certification. Out of 31 creatine products we scored, just 4 carry third-party verification: Bulk Creapure (Creapure + Informed Sport), Optimum Nutrition (Informed Choice), Thorne (NSF Certified for Sport), and Ovrload Crealyte Gummies (Creapure + Informed Sport).

The quality gap is real. Certified creatine scores 77.2/100 on average. Uncertified creatine scores 67.5. That's a 9.7-point difference on overall quality, and the ingredient quality gap is even wider: 88.5 vs 70.9.

Why so few? Third-party testing costs money, and UK regulations don't require it for sports supplements. Brands that invest in certification tend to use higher-grade raw materials too. Bulk Creapure, our top-scoring creatine at 91/100, uses Creapure-branded monohydrate manufactured in Germany with documented purity testing. Most budget creatine powders don't disclose where their creatine comes from or whether it's been independently verified.

If purity matters to you, look for one of these four certifications on the label: Creapure, Informed Sport, Informed Choice, or NSF Certified for Sport.

Is creatine monohydrate better than HCL or other forms?

Monohydrate wins. The top 5 creatine products in our database are all monohydrate-based, led by Bulk Creapure at 91/100. That's not a coincidence.

Creatine monohydrate has decades of clinical research behind it. Over 500 published studies confirm its effects on muscle strength, power output, and recovery. HCL, ethyl ester, and buffered forms have far less evidence, and none have been shown to outperform monohydrate in head-to-head trials.

The 'better absorption' claim for HCL sounds compelling, but there's limited independent data to support it at the doses you'd actually take. Monohydrate is also the cheapest form by a wide margin.

The bloating concern with monohydrate is real for some people, but it's usually a loading-phase issue. Starting at 3-5g daily (no loading phase) avoids it for most users.

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.